Testimonials, Reliability, and Points

The system is designed to provide the ability to let people take action based on limited, but filtered information. A system of points and testimonials will be used to allow users to make informed decisions (to take action or to delete the email) based on limited time investment (in gathering information). These systems will provide network based evaluations of a given social cause, and social clout and capital can be directly used to influence downstream contacts with upstream testimonials. To achieve this goal of easy evaluation, a system of points has been created to easily identify which users are to be ‘trusted’. While the system can be abused on a small scale, in aggregate, growth of a cause will be determined across the network.

Points

Points are given in two categories (the names of which are not finalized). Respect points and information points. Respect points are earned by feedback from other users (both direct and indirect) and by taking action on social causes. Information points are earned by reading about causes (and becoming more informed), submitting (successful) information to causes, and having others vouch/vote for your submitted sources. The diagram below outlines the various scenarios that points are given and taken away.

The point system is carefully engineered to have a number of direct effects. To address the Strategic Objective (SO) of encouraging self education, points will be awarded to those who click onto information sources. To increase the reliability of the system, and discourage spamming of large numbers of uninterested users, and to encourage nonsystem pressure on recipients to participate (by senders) points are awarded for higher than average response rates . SOs are also served by using points to encourage the submission of additional actions or information that can increase the effectiveness and local relevance of a cause.